NibletCast
Sahar: The Church in Turkey
Incredible. Thank you very much for these snapshots of the Saints.
Posted by J. Stapley
Thanks, Sahar. I've loved reading your posts. My husband and I spent about a year in the Middle East, mostly in Cairo and Jerusalem, but also in Amman and Irbid. It was quite an experience going to church in those cities.
Posted by Amira
i would like to see religious freedom in the church of saint sohia in constandenopules open to bazintine christians.
Posted by Ansdrew lukkas
This is very interesting. I lived in Izmir from 1994 to 1996 and attended the Ismir branch. The membership slowly got smaller and smaller, and when I left, they closed the branch. There was one Turkish member at the time but he had been inactive for the last year I lived there. Our membership consisted of about 25+ members at its height, but the active members were always about half that, and then some of those were children. We met in the schoolroom of the Dept. of Defense School there. We had to get permission to attend and enter too. The Saints there certainly had their challenges, but I'll never forget attending the baptism of one of the little girls when she turned 8. We all drove out to a beautiful spot on the Aegean Sea, had the Baptism (in the cold waters!), and then a lovely picnic on the beach. Truly wonderful!
Posted by meems
If someone could persuade Sahar to post on a regular basis, she would make a great permablogger.
Posted by danithew
Thanks, everyone. I will make sure Sahar reads your comments.
Posted by Ronan
Sahar and Ronan, many thanks.
Posted by Mark IV
On BYU, Guy Fawkes, and Bloggersnacking
Hilarious! Thanks for visiting us. Your account is generally accurate except you seem to have embellished on the Steve Evans front. Discussion of him came up not during our discussion of John Dehlin's role at Sunstone but rather when we were talking about who was now in control of bcc ("how will the Emperor maintain control without the bureaucracy?" and all that). I think the end consensus was that, as regards bcc, Steve Evans was the "Wizard of Oz" but not that he was "evil."
As for the peepstone, I'm not sure whether I learned about that in primary. It just seems like I learned it as a kid--probably from my dad, I guess.
Good times, Ronan! Too bad Becky and the kids couldn't be there.
Posted by john fowles
Thanks for the update and personality profiles...very helpful.
Oh, I forgot to take my wagon and "guy" and go up and down the street asking "Penny for the guy?" I miss the bonfire and fireworks too!
Posted by don
John F. must have had the strangest CTR class of all time.
It sounds like it was fun -- I'm sorry Serenity Valley and I live in the wrong part of the country for this stuff!
How did the speech go, anyway?
Posted by RoastedTomatoes
Great summation, Ronan.
That was a funny conversation about us all being average Mormons. The context, for those not present: Many of us reported that we knew about Joseph's Peepstone long ago, even as children. John Dehlin's rebuttal is that we're not the average Mormons. The Fowles brothers and J. Max disagreed strongly, staking a claim to perfect Mormon averageness. It was then conceded that each of them was raised by a Ph.D father with deep interest in Mormon thought. Allison Welch Fowles' presence in the room didn't aid them in their insistence on Mormon mediocrity either.
As for my views on the law-- I have been libeled! My true position: I have little interest in academic discussions of the law. Most academic-minded people seem to believe that's all there is. But the real joy of the law comes in the nitty-gritty of drafting good arguments and advocating compelling positions-- there's nothing I enjoy more. Just so everyone knows that the millions I"m presently earning at a small firm in a minor City aren't the sole reason I do it.
Anyway, great night. Had a very nice time chatting with everyone. I'd love it if we could have more gatherings of more people. Even beats blogging.
By the way, John and Ronan, as an interesting illustration of my point about the relevance of a person's background in assessing her arguments, see here
Certainly not dispositive, but worth knowing, wouldn't you say?
Posted by Ryan Bell
I'm glad you had fun. When you guys come out next, we will have to find other old clothes to burn out back.
Posted by John C.
Truly a joy.
"By the way, John and Ronan..."
P.S. Hey Ryan....which John? Weren't there 4 of us? ;)
Posted by John Dehlin
Latter-day Saint Liberation Front
Serenity Valley and I would like to take this opportunity to thank Flannery O'Connor, Romulo Betancourt, L.N. Alem, Hegel, Julie Delpy, and all the other people who have made this day possible! Also special thanks to John Fowles for verifying our reality--not a trivial thing in these days of suspicion and doubt. Finally, I'd like to express my special appreciation for the Marx Brothers, who are funny.
Posted by RoastedTomatoes
We welcome you, RT. Just think: Fowles, The Great Dave, Thang Boy, J, Justin Butterfield (Justin Butterfield!) and Cool Rusty all voted you into the company of flotsam aka the Founding Archipelago. That's a bloggernacle elite right there. I abstained, mostly under the guidance of Anthony Stewart Head (Giles from Buffy)--my uncle--who is still grumpy with you.
Posted by Ronan
Welcome aboard RT!
Ronan, are you really related to Giles?
Posted by Geoff J
Maybe I is, maybe I isn't, but don't bank on any autographs lads!
Posted by Ronan
Ronan,
If you're related to Giles, then I'd be content with your autograph.
Posted by Serenity Valley
Will the Mormon Archipelago logo get another circle?
Posted by John Mansfield
Get yer Mormon Archipelago T-shirts
Just bought mine...in gold...
Posted by Ronan
I got mine, I think I'll wear it to SS class.
Posted by don
That Rusty's a talented bloke, Don.
Posted by Ronan
Oooo... I'm incredibly tempted. And I really could use a new random, general use sweatshirt...
Posted by Tanya Spackman
Ronan, Rusty is very talented...the apple doesn't drop far from the tree....and the tree is his mom. I can't draw stick men....but I did serve in England and that counts for a lot!
Posted by don
Just ordered mine. Yellow wins. That way, when the armpits start to stain, no one will notice.
Posted by David J
Just ordered mine. Totally yellow. That way, when the armpits start to stain, no one will notice.
Sorry, dial-up connection died, and I thought the former message hadn't gone through... Alas, still living in the 90s at my house...
Posted by David J
I love the "We're tight like unto a dish" saying.
Posted by danithew
I'm asking my mom for one for Christmas.
Definitely the dish one.
Posted by Crystal
We got multiple shirts! Can't wait to try them on.
Posted by Geoff J
Grandpa Smith and the Witches (Archive)
"Lost" in the Bloggernacle
I vote for yours truly as a cunning Sawyer/Jack hybrid.
Michael is Rusty.
Artz is JMW.
Locke? Tough one. Maybe Redelfs. It's the belief in destiny that seals it.
Hurley: Aaron Brown
Posted by Steve Evans
You wish, Evans. Hurley you are. But don't be sad: Hurley's a lovely chap.
Posted by Ronan
Can I be the high school teacher who got blown up by dynamite?
Posted by Kim Siever
But Artz (apparently that was his name, or so curelom whispers) hasn't returned yet, Kim. You did!
Posted by Ronan
Okay, Ronan, you're going to have to start folding your own clothes now... Sheesh... I'm clearly a better choice as Sawyer, but no, has to be someone who was blogging four months earlier than me, right?
Posted by RoastedTomatoes
Actually, RT, that's a good call. Sawyer's not his real name is it? Can you say "sweet cheeks?" And can anyone out there say "brother" in a Scottish accent, there's a spot to fill.
Posted by Ronan
It's Irish, not Scottish.
Posted by Kim Siever
Sorry, gov, but he's a Scot. No question. I thought you were a closet-Scot? You should no better.
Posted by Ronan
Er, know.
Posted by Ronan
Well, technically, he's Irish and Peruvian, but you are right about the accent it is Scottish. Or rather a combination of Trinidad and Scotland. I'll be happy to be Desmond, the guy not born in Scotland who still wants to be Scottish (okay the actor, not the character, but still).
How'd you know I was a closet Scot?
Posted by Kim Siever
I have to admit that I have never seen Lost . If this Locke bloke is me, he better be handsome, witty, and erudite.
Posted by J. Stapley
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/tv/lost_locke250.jpg
Just like you, J.
And Kim, Desmond is Jesus. (And you want to live in Aberdeen - see, I remember.)
Posted by Ronan
So I can't be Desmond?
I see you remember, but I don't remember posting it. I wish I had a way of keeping track of where I have commented.
Posted by Kim Siever
Kim,
I hereby knight you Sir Desmond, he of the maniacal eyes. Hey, you said it not me.
Posted by Ronan
Maniacal eyes? Okay, now you're just making up stuff that I've said.
Posted by Kim Siever
I would like to be Scott...no wait, Steve...um, you know who I mean.
Posted by John C.
Kim, brother, is Desmond a good guy or a bad guy?
And anyone else: who are the Others (not T&S, the real Others), and what's going on? Spoil away...
Posted by Ronan
Yeah, John, fold away...
Posted by Ronan
Me as Locke, that's a lock. I even have the same hair. Actually he does have a bit less than me. But I am cool like him.
Posted by don
Warning: Speculation follows!
A currently popular theory is that the people on the boat that took Walt were the DeGroots from the initiation film. People who buy this theory claim that the people in the film and the people on the boat look alike.
Ronan, why would your wife want to be Kate? A bit troubled and dangerous, behind that pretty face. Or Shannon? does that make you her stepbrother? Ewww. Besides, she's about to die....
Just because they're animals: Vincent == Curelom
and it's ARZT, ARZT! not ARTZ! The guy's in a thousand tiny bits, and still can't get any respect.
Posted by Bryce I
And a great link proving that Lost is really set in the Zork universe:
http://www.teevee.org/archive/2005/05/27/
Posted by Bryce I
"Kim, brother, is Desmond a good guy or a bad guy?"
Yes.
Just like me.
Posted by Kim Siever
You know, I thought that Desmond was Australian. I think he's a good guy. Thank you for the compliment, I think Rose is a very nice character.
I don't watch this show very often so I'm "lost" as to some of the characters you are referring to. Is there a place I can go to check out the characters?
Posted by kristen j
Ronan, I think the flashback you're searching for for M* is the guy that plays both Hurley's mean boss at Mr. Cluck's and Locke's mean boss at the Box Company. Is that stuffed shirt enough for you?
But who's Rousseau? Mysterious woman who appears infrequently and at random, guided only by her whims and delusions and love for her child/ren? KHH anyone?
Also, Claire is superstitious, needy, and impressionable-- Have you guys ever met that Davis Bell guy?
Posted by Ryan Bell
Ok - the wife putting a word in - I never said I wanted to be either of those women - I'm not really like any of them, but my dear hubby if you're just trying to say how beautiful I am, then that's fine!!
But who would you be Ronan? I'd personally go for the Sawyer type - is that you?????
Posted by Rebecca
I already claimed Sawyer -- and, Rebecca, I'm taken...
Posted by RoastedTomatoes
He said in his post, Rebecca. He wants to be Charlie.
Posted by Kim Siever
ah indeed - i can cope with a rock star type too!
Posted by Rebecca
So...who's Ana Lucia? Libby? Eko? Bernard?
Posted by Kim Siever
Geeks and dweebs all of you. This post was a joke, and yet here you are, still fighting over these fictional characters.
Anyway, where was I?
Kim: the back-half is BoH. Bunch of weirdos.
Ryan: perfect, absolutely perfect.
Kristen: google "lost." You can then participate in the lunatic discussion of these things.
Posted by Ronan
Oh, d'uh! Here I was telling Rebecca to read your post.
Posted by Kim Siever
I think Jim Faulconer on T&S is a shoo-in for John Locke. Besides the philosophy connection, Jim always keeps his cool when things get crazy, has a bit of wisdom for every situation, and is as dedicated to cracking enigmatic scriptures as Locke was to opening the hatch.
Posted by will
But don't turn your back on him...
Posted by will
Just now saw this thread.
Walt?!?!?! Ronan!
But Walt does have some mysterious power that causes birds ("fowls") to crash into glass windows and things that he is scared of to appear in real life (polar bear from the back of his comic book). So I guess that's cool, except he's not much of central figure.
Charlie's a good fit for you Ronan if you refuse to take Arzt (he is, after all, the closest thing to a professor).
KHH is perfect for Rousseau. Steve for Jack. J. Stapley for Locke is a good fit since he helps everyone create their blogs and troubleshoot when huge "pissed off giraffs" (Hurley's description) come sniffing around (where are the pissed off giraffs this season?).
For some reason I'm thinking Hurley for Aaron B.--they've both got the CA connection and the irreverent attitude.
Shannon is the anti-thesis of anyone at FMH (you have to resort to Desperate Housewives to get a fit for them, j/k). I'm thinking Celibate in the City? I just don't know though. I don't want to insult anyone by making this comparison.
Kate might be Allison from don't let's start. That has always seemed a mysterious blog to me. How can we be sure that "Allison" is on the up-and-up?
RT, I don't know if you're "tough" enough to be Sawyer, although the pseudonym does make for somewhat of a fit. The problem is that I know you personally and can't really match you two up. . . .
Kaimi is obviously Locke's dad.
Have to think more about the rest. . . .
Posted by john fowles
The Wailing Wall
Ronan, just wondering why you titled your post "The Wailing Wall". I followed your link back to the NYT Travel site and yep, they caption the picture "The Western Wall". I studied at BYU's Jerusalem Center, where we were taught to use the more respectful designation of "Western Wall"--so it caught my eye in your post.
(p.s. same situation with the "Holy Mount" rather than "Temple Mount" etc.)
Posted by Ashley
From the Jewish Virtual Library ("Western Wall" is indeed in vogue today):
The "Wailing-place" was a translation of El-Mabka, or "the Place of Weeping," the traditional Arabic term for the wall. Within a short time after the commencement of the British Mandate, however, "Wailing Wall" became the standard English term, nor did Jews have any compunctions about using it. Only after the Six-Day War in 1967 did it become de rigueur in Jewish circles to say "Western Wall"— a reflection of the feeling, first expressed by official Israeli usage and then spreading to the Diaspora, that, with the reunification of Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, there was no longer anything to wail about. Henceforward, the wall should be a place of celebration.
Posted by Ronan
Gettysburg, Pa.
Well put and a great lesson for your son.
War is hell for everyone, some just get to stay there.
Posted by don
Thanks Don.
Ronan mourns, Oman wooes . Well, each to his own.
Posted by Ronan
Why is it that those of us who believe as we do always feel we have to say, "I'm not a pacifist, but ...."
The fact is, one doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that the killing of civilians (whether by the U.S. in Hiroshima or by Saddam Hussein against the Kurds) is wrong. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that manufacturing evidence to justify going into a war is wrong. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that a nation's money can be better spent on education (or, as you say, building earthquake-proof buildings) than on building more weapons for killing people. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that the "right" to drive gas-guzzling vehicles is worth killing for. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that it is wrong to arrest people and keep them in prison indefinitely without a trial or access to a lawyer. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that it is wrong for a country such as North Korea to starve its own people and use the money that should be spent on food for developing nuclear weapons. One doesn't have to be a pacifist to believe that it is wrong to sell arms to terrorists and then use the profits to support other terrorists. One does not have to be a pacifist to believe that our enemies are God's children and our own brothers and sisters.
The Scriptures and modern revelation make clear that there are times where it is just, perhaps even obligatory, to defend our lives and the lives of our families. But those times are rare, and even when they occur we must hold ourselves to the highest standards by seeking only to defend ourselves and to leave the vengeance to God.
Posted by EricG
The Perils of Polybloggy
Great post.
Most of my 'nacle reading is done through the Archipelago.
Posted by Crystal
Thanks for missing DMI, Ronan. I think one of the biggest challenges of running a "successful" solo or small blog (i.e., one that is worth reading most of the time) is just coming up with new and interesting topics or commentary on a daily basis. After awhile, most bloggers end up writing on the same topics or saying the same thing over and over (and this afflicts group blogs, too). So my "blog sabbatical" gives me a break from the daily grind and hopefully gives me a chance to recharge my batteries and get a few new ideas.
Posted by Dave
Ronan, interesting ideas, if somewhat radical.
I don't see the MA as the Great Equalizer that you seem to make it out to be, although I'm sure it's bound to have that effect. The group blogs have something solo blogs will lack, and that is the group dynamic.
Posted by Steve Evans
I've taken a de facto sabbatical from my blog, simply because I've been so busy. But I also somehow blog at three blogs. (Mormon Metaphysics, Millennial Star, and Bloggernacle Times)
Having said that though I do tend to think MA lets infrequent but good solo blogs get read. I use it pretty regularly. I'm also not entirely sure that the "group dynamic" means a whole lot. I think a lot of solo blogs have that simply because of the comments.
Posted by clark
The group blogs have something solo blogs will lack, and that is the group dynamic.
I'm not sure I agree with this. Solo(ish) blogs that always comment on one another's posts have the same "group dynamic" you describe. Therefore the only thing group blogs actually provide that solo(ish) blogs don't is a single URL. But it is true that single URL = convenience for readers and more convenience for readers almost inevitably leads to bigger audiences...
Posted by Geoff J
The only thing that group blogs have is that they draw more people in; you are not going to get a 300+ mega thread at a small blog. But some people are put-off by that.
Dave, I don't think that you have to post every day. If people use the MA, they will see so many goodies that they don't feel like one single blog has to offer them something every single day.
Posted by Ronan
I agree with Clark. I look first at MA to see what catches my eye, it doesn't matter who's blog it is, it is the content that makes me read.
I do think we can all do more to increase the MA readership. Promoting each other's posts, especially outside the MA. I don't mean blatantly, unless called for.
I'm glad to be a very small part of the MA and hope it continues to grow.
Thanks for your post.
Posted by don
Maybe it's pie-in-the-sky, but our intention with ldsblogs.org was indeed to provide one URL for everyone, Geoff.
Look, I don't want to overbake this. T&S will continue to squash all in its wake. But I would hate to see the small blogs give-up. To avoid that, the MA is here to serve you: write good stuff and the Great Island will assign you a box of glory.
Posted by Ronan
Maybe it's pie-in-the-sky, but our intention with ldsblogs.org was indeed to provide one URL for everyone, Geoff.
I completely agree Ronan. I think the original vision has come together for us quite nicely so far too.
you are not going to get a 300+ mega thread at a small blog.
Unless you blast the idea of exhaustive foreknowledge of course... I'm up in the 290's on that post .
Posted by Geoff J
There was a learning curve with blogging for me. For a while, I fealt I needed to build credibility by offering sweet content several times a week. I finally plateaued and took like a month off. I have now found my happy place. I view Splendid Sun as *my* space. I like things to stay on topic and want to engage comments. My posts are typically more research oriented and I don't want a lot of the stuff that can happen at *public* space blogs.
When I want to have things outside of my space I post elsewhere.
Posted by J. Stapley
...also, before the LDSBlogs.org, I fealt that I had to give people to come to my sight every day or I would lose readership. Now, I feel like I can post once a week and still maintain the same readership because people see the healines at the Archipelago
Speaking of Polybloggy
Posted by William Morris
And this is of the worst kind.
Nate and Kaimi are off marrying gentiles.
Headlifian Blogs
The MA Founders
United Brethren is currently on blog sabbatical.
Etc.
Sahar: The Church in Turkey
Sahar's final post is about her life in Turkey (where she is studying for a PhD). One hopes that Turkey--if it really wants EU membership--will improve its religious freedom laws.The Church in Turkey The church in Turkey consists of 3 branches. The first and main branch is in Istanbul. The membership records of that branch show 30 members, but about 15-20 attend church every Sunday. There is another branch in Adona which has about 30 members. The third branch is in Ankara and this is the branch I have been attending for about a year now. Our branch in Ankara consists of 15 members. Regular attendance in the branch each Sunday is about 8-10. We have an American family in the branch with two cute girls. We have another American who is here also for a short time. The only family we have who is here on a long time basis is the Kilickaya family who are Turkish. Mehmet Kilickaya was the first Turkish member of the church. He was baptized in Denmark. His wife later joined the church and became the first Turkish person to be baptized by the hands of a Turkish priesthood holder (her husband Mehmet) in Turkey. They are an amazing couple with remarkable conversion stories. We have had our share of trouble in the Ankara branch. We had a hard time finding a meeting place since it is not legal to meet as a church group in houses. We used to meet in our branch president’s house, but after receiving threats we were forced to find a different meeting place. For now, we meet at the American army base in Ankara, which is not really a perfect place because to enter the base a person needs to obtain permission. So, when a friend of mine says, “I want to come with you to church,” I have to apologize and say: “Sorry I have to get you a permit first.” |
On BYU, Guy Fawkes, and Bloggersnacking
I just got back from a whirlwind trip to Utah. I was there to give a faculty lecture at the BYU religion department (speaking about my FARMS-funded ancient beekeeping project). For this mission-field blogger, it was also fun to schmooze with some of the bloggernacle elite. First up, FPR's John C., an old mate from Johns Hopkins. John C. is a wonderful human being and funny to boot. I stayed with John and his wife in Orem. Much to my delight they had planned a Guy Fawkes bonfire in their yard, complete with an effigy of old Guy, that dastardly continental Catholic who tried to blow up Parliament 400 years ago today. At BYU, I ran into Frank McIntyre in his nasty, pre-fab office. During the lulls in our conversation about socialized medicine, Frank told me of the joys of tracing IP's. The Great and Spacious SLC Bloggersnacker was at the Fowles' home. Alli is the best and most patient host ever: she supplied the cheese and the pumpkin soup and raised nary an eyebrow over our bannergate gossipping. Bob Caswell (who designs his anti-BYU posts around his wife's experiences there, it seems) told us that he wasn't that liberal. The Fowles brothers, J-Max and the ever cheerful John Dehlin debated (nay, argued) over the virtue of ad-hominem attacks and whether Sunstone was evil. It was decided in the end that Steve Evans was indeed evil, and that he should stop paying all these people to comment on how much they love him. Ryan Bell, on the other hand, is not evil, even though he admitted that he hates law and only practices it because he wants to get rich. The other consensus: bloggernacle denizens are not normal Mormons. Oh, and John F. claims he was taught about Joseph's peepstone in CTR class. |
Latter-day Saint Liberation Front
Latter-day Saint Liberation Front has joined the "Founding Islands" of the Mormon Archipelago. We have it on good authority that Roasted Tomatoes and Serenity Valley are real people. We think their names may be fake, though. |
Get yer Mormon Archipelago T-shirts
Everyone needs a Mormon T-shirt, but Moroni-Nike swooshes are so lame, don't ya think? Enter the Mormon Archipelago into this gaping breach. We are now selling T-shirts via Zazzle. Thanks to Rusty for the graphics and Mark for two of the slogans. The $3.57 that we make will go into the Great Mormon Archipelago Webspace Fund (aka J.'s wallet) and for buying stamps so we can send out junk-mail advertising for the Archipelago journal. And in case you were wondering: Mormon Archipelago equals the entire www.ldsblogs.org community. Wear your Bloggernacle T-shirt with pride (or loathing, if you're the Snarker). Hurry: Zazzle is offering free shipping through October 30 (ZAZZLEFS1005 at checkout). (Next: MA bling.) |
Grandpa Smith and the Witches (Archive)
It's always been a slight puzzlement that a religion that has an aversion to playing with face cards (occultic?) celebrates Halloween (also occultic?) with abandon. I'm glad, though, because I get to dress my son as Yoda today without guilt. Anyway, here's my Halloween post. In the famous Salem witch trials of 1692, Joseph Smith's great-great-grandfather Samuel Smith and Samuel's father-in-law John Gould testified against Mary Easty and Sarah Wilds. Both women were executed. Here are the court records: The deposistion of Samuell Smith of Boxford about 25 yers who testifieth and saith that about five years sence I was one night att the house of Isaac Estick sen'r. of Topsfeild...and as I was agoeing whom that night about a quarter of a mille from the said Esticks house by a stone wall I Received a little blow on my shoulder with I know not what and the stone wall rattleed very much which affrighted me my horse also was affrighted very much but I cannot give the reson of it.Rather flimsy testimony I would say, at least for "witchcraft". Anyway, it's ironic that Joseph's detractors often accuse him of dabbling in the occult. Whilst stories of seer stones and "peeping" are accepted by informed Mormons today (for example, Rough Stone Rolling pp. 48-52), rebuttals of some of the more lurid claims can be found at www.fair-lds.org. Search under "magic". But folk religion seems to have existed alongside Christianity among the poor of the American frontier, and I think some of this rather benign superstition still lingers in modern Mormonism. Urban legends about protective garments would be one example. Anyway, further reading on Mormon "magic" this Halloween would include: - Orson Scott Card's Alvin Maker series (based loosely on the Joseph Smith story) celebrates the magic "knacks" of Alvin's family. - John L. Brooke, Refiner's Fire - the making of Mormon cosmology (read FARMS review for LDS apologetic response). - D. Michael Quinn - Early Mormonism and the magic world view (also read FARMS review) Happy Halloween! |
"Lost" in the Bloggernacle
Spurious allusions between tv/movies and Mormonism are widespread. If people can seriously suggest that Yoda was based on Spencer W. Kimball, then I can make connections between Lost and the Bloggernacle. Utterly fatuous, I' m sure, but here goes: BCC and its pals in the Mormon Archipelago are clearly the front half of the plane. We're the cool, friendly ones. Times and Seasons, being evil, are the Others (aka the Dharma Initiative?) I'll let you decide who Ethan is. Banner of Heaven, being kooky, are the back half. Alternatively, BoH could be the Others, full of mystery, possibly fake. Where would that leave T&S? The boring, fatty real-world flash-backs? Time to have a wee/make a cup of tea and wait for the real action to get going. Actually, this seems more befitting of M*. The other Bloggernacle islands, atolls etc. can only be the extras who fold clothes in the background. As for individual bloggers (besides evil Ethan who is whoever you want him to be; and drawing on the BCC/MA crew only, see above):
|
The Wailing Wall
Great picture from the New York Times of a Mormon woman (left) at the Wailing Wall : "I never really dreamed that I would make it there someday, but it was a dream come true. I had a very peaceful feeling when I was at the wall, and I was thinking about Jesus and that he could have been there. Just the thought of that was very overwhelming. I thought it was great that, with all those people of different faiths, we could all get together. And it was interesting to see how they were worshiping. They had their faces in the book and were moving their bodies back and forth. Then the way they have the women on one side and the men on the other: the young men were getting their bar mitzvahs, and the mothers were all standing on their chairs to try and see what was going on." NYT Travel, October 9, 2005. |
Gettysburg, Pa.
The Perils of Polybloggy
Dave's gone fishing. This is a sad moment in the Bloggernacle. Dave has universal "cool," DMI is a 'nacle highlight, and he even made it to Beliefnet's Blog Heaven. So why's he gone? Ostensibly because he's busy right now and can't commit time to three blogs. That's right, Dave is a Bloggernacle polyblogger: DMI, Bloggernacle Times, and BCC. But (and here's the rub), he will still be blogging at BT and BCC. His own blog, the venerable DMI, has been offered up on the altar of Walmart. Been there, done that. Who can resist the lure of the Big Blogs? If I have a great idea for a post, do I plonk it at United Brethren where it may be read by 100 people, or at BCC where a 1000 people will likely read? It's all about fame, baby, and we all want that. But Dave's gone fishing, UB has only now (I think) recovered from the great BCC sell-out, Stapley hardly ever posts at Splendid Sun (although they are invariably good posts). Will John C. and Ned save their best stuff for VSoM.? Is Fowles going to pull out the stops for BT or the View? There are many others in this predicament. So, what's the future of small blogs? It's easy really: use the Mormon Archipelago. Here, all blogs get fairly equal billing. In theory it shouldn't matter where I post as you'd see all of them at the same page at the Archipelago (whether United Brethren, Bloggernacle Times, or By Common Consent). The Archipelago is the NFL parity draft of the 'Nacle, our very own agrarian revolution. The small blogs must survive to keep the big boys honest. And those of us who polyblog (and it's great really) need no longer have a "favourite wife." |